WWW Wednesday. This meme is from shouldbereading.
To play along, just answer the following three (3) questions…
• What are you currently reading?
• What did you recently finish reading?
• What do you think you’ll read next?
• What are you currently reading?
I’m listening to Midwinter of the Spirit (Merrily Watkins 2)
, an English mystery series by Phil Rickman. I thought I’d read this kind of series before–Anglican vicar and parish priest as sleuth. I was so wrong. Rickman says: “I knew very little about vicars or how they worked. The last thing I wanted was to write series about one. I’m not much of a churchgoer… not when there’s a service on, anyway. But suddenly there she was, and I realised what a risky, uncertain occupation she’d taken on.”
By the second book, that occupation is established. “Merrily Watkins has been appointed Deliverance Consultant,or Advisor on the Paranormal, for the Diocese of Hereford. This is a real job; there’s at least one in every diocese in the UK. They work with psychiatrists, social workers… and also the police (inevitably, in this series, this is the aspect of the job that predominates.) And their own beliefs are often tested. Which is what I wanted. There are few certainties in this series. The borderline between psychology and the unexplained is laid out in barbed wire.”
You might know this job better as exorcist. From wikipedia:
In 1974, the Church of England set up the “Deliverance ministry“.[10] As part of its creation, every diocese in the country was equipped with a team trained in both exorcism and psychiatry. According to its representatives, most cases brought before it have conventional explanations, and actual exorcisms are quite rare; although, blessings are sometimes given to people for psychological reasons.[10]
Anglican priests may not perform an exorcism without permission from the Diocesan bishop. An exorcism is not usually performed unless the bishop and his team of specialists (including a psychiatrist and physician) have approved it.
Fascinating.
So, a bit of paranormal. A bit of mystery. A bit of spiritual testing. And the fact that she has a pagan daughter. Ingredients blended and tossed really, really well by a very good writer. Which may explain why I’ve listened to the first book and most of the second since last week’s WWW, and yet–
I am still reading the same books I was reading last week, The House of the Seven Gables
and11/22/63: A Novel by Stephen King and Blackwood (Strange Chemistry)
by Gwenda Bond. Okay, I’m lying. I haven’t actually started Seven Gables but am going to read a chapter of it before beginning my next Kindle book once I finish Blackwood. Hawthorne’s waiting by my bed, and King can wait for me to start Hawthorne before I dive back into his time travel tome, right? Right.
• What did you recently finish reading?
As I said above, I just finished Wine of Angels (Merrily Watkins 1)
by Phil Rickman. I discovered this series by exploring Ben Aaronovich’s site. Since I have told you before that I love Ben’s urban fantasy series set in London that begins with (US title) Midnight Riot, I decided to follow his lead here and I am loving Phil Rickman’s series, too. I even love Merrily’s name, which might have seemed too twee in other circumstances, but she is not a twee character. The explanation, that she was born on Christmas Day and her mum hated the name Noelle. Her dad’s favorite Christmas carol, however, was “Ding Dong Merrily On High.” Well, that’s one of my faves, too. Anything that lets me sing “glorias” to my heart’s desire is a very good carol in my book.
This is not as common a carol in the US as it is in England so if you don’t know it, you can listen to the most traditional form here by the Choristers of King’s College Cambridge and a sassier form here by Celtic Woman
. I don’t usually like people taking liberties with Christmas hymns and carols and prefer them the way I learned to sing them, but this is a very light, lovely rendition. Is this a new carol to you or had you heard it before? I first sang it in the 9th grade, had never heard it before then.
I also finished listening to Surrender to the Devil by Lorraine Heath, another of the Fagin’s Lads romances inspired by Oliver Twist. I really do love that premise, as I’ve said, and I think there may only be one left to read/listen to. I am totally perplexed at why these are marketed as “The Scoundrels of St James” rather than as “Fagin’s Lads.” I think the hook that they were all raised together as thieves and pickpockets under Fagin’s care is fascinating and handled really well. I think it’s a much more compelling hook than the generic one used. Makes me wonder if somebody thought a reference to Charles Dickens was too literary for a romance series? This was Frannie Darling’s story, who got her name because that’s what Fagin always called her, “Frannie, darling, will you fetch me my jug?” and so she thought it was her name.
• What do you think you’ll read next?
Will I nab the next Merrily book, the next Fagin’s Lad? Will I finally finish Lymond? Will I read something totally different? I do have some totally different books waiting in the wings. I don’t know. I don’t know!
Don’t ask me these hard questions unless you want me to lie.
Wait, I asked the question, didn’t I?
Oh hush.
I’m keeping a running total of my reading challenges–the Historical Fiction Reading Challenge (see banner at the bottom of the right sidebar) and my own challenge, the Embarrassment of Riches Challenge –and will post a January wrap-up on those on the 31st, in which I’ll ask everybody who is participating to respond with their current numbers in comments.
And I have to remind you–it’s here! The chance for you to win a $20 Amazon Gift Certificate for leaving an Amazon review of Scandalous (available at Book View Cafe, Amazon and now, at Kobo) before February 14. Details here.
What about you? What have you been reading lately? Put the link to your WWW Wednesday entry in comments, or just tell me!